These are the items that interested me on a quick look at the report:
Relevant Conduct (Question 5)
Percentages of judges agreeing that the following should be included in relevant conduct:
• Conduct that was charged in a count that was later dismissed? -- 31 %Standard of Proof in Sentencing Hearings (Question 6)
• All reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of a jointly undertaken criminal activity? 79%
• Conduct that was charged in a count that was later dismissed? 31%
• Uncharged conduct that is presented at trial or admitted by the defendant in court? 77%
•Uncharged conduct referenced only in the presentence report? 32%
• Acquitted conduct? 16%
You should review the table in this question, but there seems to be clear support for a prependerance of the evidence standard for sentencing hearings, even for those findings that increase a sentence. I think there is some argument that at least some of those findings require either a clear and convincing standard or even a beyond a reasonable doubt standard. See Alan Ellis & Mark H. Allenbaugh, Standards of Proof at Sentencing, 24 Criminal Justice 62 (Fall 2009)
Departures (Question 14);
There is a high level of agreement (76%) that the departure provisions int the Guidelines Manual do not adequately reflect the reasons for the sentence outside the guideline range, with 65% finding the Guidelines policy statements too restrictive.
General Assessment of the Guidelines and Federal Sentencing (Question 17)
Only about one-third or less agreed with the following statements:
• Overall, the federal sentencing guidelines have reduced unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct.Purposes of Sentencing (Question 19)
• Overall, the federal sentencing guidelines have increased certainty in meeting the purposes of sentencing.
• Overall, the federal sentencing guidelines have increased fairness in meeting the purposes of sentencing.
Overwhelming support for advisory Guidelines.
Tax Crimes Sentencing Questions
None
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.