I have just recently come across the plea agreement in United States v. Robert Edward Cone (SD TX Crim. No. H-11-617), here. The plea was entered in February; sentencing is set for early next year. The plea and my personal knowledge of the case (I represented a witness) indicate that, although a foreign account and the Schedule B foreign account question were involved, the case was an outlier to the Government's foreign account initiative. Hence, I have put the case in spreadsheet with an indication that it is an atypical case. First the key data and then I provide a narrative explanation.
Defendant: Robert Edward Cone
Banks: Royal Bank of Canada Jersey Islands)
Entities: Yes (Jomach Limited, a BVI entity)
High Balance: ? [See below]
FBAR Penalty: ? [See below]
High Balance: Unknown
Count of Plea: Tax perjury, Section 7206(1) with 3 year max sentence
Tax Loss: $282,691 (agreed as "relevant conduct" tax loss because it was a 2001 liability and the plea count of conviction was for 2006)
Restitution: $939,917 (contractual restitution for the year 2001, consisting of the tax, apparently the civil fraud penalty and tax on each).
5K1 Departure Possibility: No
Court: SD TX
Judge: Ewing Werlein (Wikipedia entry here)
Jack Townsend offers this blog on Federal Tax Crimes principally for tax professionals and tax students. It is not directed to lay readers -- such as persons who are potentially subject to U.S. civil and criminal tax or related consequences. LAY READERS SHOULD READ THE PAGE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN TITLE "INTENDED AUDIENCE FOR BLOG; CAUTIONARY NOTE TO LAY READERS." Thank you.
Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Canada. Show all posts
Friday, October 26, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)