This blog on Federal Tax Crimes is for tax professionals and tax students. It is not directed to lay readers -- such as persons who are potentially subject to civil and criminal tax or related consequences. LAY READERS SHOULD READ THE PAGE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN TITLED LAY READER LIMITATIONS. Also, please see the page in the right hand column to vote on this blog as a Top Tax Law Blog.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
UBS U.S. Clients Sue in Switzerland -- Dumb or Smart?
So the question to ponder is whether this move was so smart after all. Sometimes it is better to 'fess up when caught with your britches down (at least that's what people who have been caught with their britches down tell me). This is particularly apropos here where 'fessing up, properly handled, would permit these taxpayers to dodge the criminal prosecution bullet. And, in this regard, as I noted earlier, the Government cannot prosecute all of these guys, so why would anyone want to stand out from the crowd in this way, particularly when this lawsuit is unlikely to affect final resolution of the matter? (I am assuming in this regard that the Government will eventually, well within the criminal statute of limitations, find out who participated in this law suit adventure.)
1 comments:
Please make sure that your comment is relevant to the blog entry. Your comment is moderated before being posted so there will be a time delay. Also, for those regular commenters on the blog who otherwise do not want to identify by name, readers would find it helpful if you would choose a unique anonymous indentifier other than just Anonymous. This will help readers identify other comments from a trusted source, so to speak.
Jack,
ReplyDeleteVery well put!
I am wondering:
Do you suppose these plaintiffs could file anonymous lawsuits (or under "Authorized Pseudonyms" in accordance with applicable Swiss law including but not limited to the EU's privacy laws)?
I would welcome your views....even if based on no more than a mere educated guess.