There is a flurry of news this morning about UBS, probably the most egregious of Swiss banks in the business of enabling U.S. tax cheats:
1. The United States filed papers today to drop the criminal case. See the reports from USA Today here and Bloomberg here.
2. The Swiss bank regulator called on the Swiss banks to overhaul their services for wealthy foreigners to avoid the type of debacle with the U.S. tax authorities. See the WSJ report here. I suppose that what the Swiss banks will do is not to abandon the business, but become smarter at it. The Swiss banks make their money, not because they can better manage money and investments than other banks in the world but because, at least until recently, they were better at hiding it from prying eyes. It is unlikely that the Swiss will abandon such a lucrative market (there are still people willing to pay plenty to hide money, be they tax cheats, drug dealers, Middle East potentates raking off money from their citizens, or whatever). So, the Swiss bankers will just have to be smarter and move into deeper stealth mode. It remains to be seen whether the Swiss Government will be diligent in curbing those types of activities or will only do the superficial thing here.
3. In a related development, the Swiss are reported to be close to some type of deal with the German Government regarding accounts owned by German taxpayers. See Reuters article here.
Jack Townsend offers this blog on Federal Tax Crimes principally for tax professionals and tax students. It is not directed to lay readers -- such as persons who are potentially subject to U.S. civil and criminal tax or related consequences. LAY READERS SHOULD READ THE PAGE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN TITLE "INTENDED AUDIENCE FOR BLOG; CAUTIONARY NOTE TO LAY READERS." Thank you.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Developments on the UBS / Swiss Front
Labels:
Offshore evasion,
Swiss Banks,
UBS
1 comment:
Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To your point 2 above, the DOJ attack on UBS seems similar to Mr. Giuliani's attack on Wall Street insider trading--much noise, few results. The person who seems to have suffered most is Mr. Birkenfeld, who torched UBS' operation, albeit it seems for his own personal gain. As you suggest, the Swiss will not abandon this highly and, until Mr. Birkenfeld strolled into the DOJ offices with a dud lawyer, low risk operation--they will simply reduce their risk by making sure transactions are conducted outside the US through nominee subsidiaries. Bermuda is good and close! And it doesn't seem that the settlement agreement or treaty would cover this. What a shame, and shame on Mr. Downing for letting this happen.
ReplyDelete