Another UBS client, Peter A. Schober, was sentenced on 10/5/11. I blogged the original charges, Other UBS Account Holders are Charged (10/28/10), here. The following are the key bullet points as of now:
Taxpayer: Peter A. Schober
Bank: UBS
Entity(ies): Yes (Small Guard Foundation)
Guilt: By Plea Agreement - 1 Count FBAR violation.
Sentence: 1 month incarceration; 2 months home; 6 months supervised release
Unreported Income: ?
Tax Loss: $77,870.67
FBAR Penalty: $773,652
Court: D MA
Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
I will supplement these bullet points when more information is available. I will also update the spreadsheet at that time.
Jack Townsend offers this blog on Federal Tax Crimes principally for tax professionals and tax students. It is not directed to lay readers -- such as persons who are potentially subject to U.S. civil and criminal tax or related consequences. LAY READERS SHOULD READ THE PAGE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN TITLE "INTENDED AUDIENCE FOR BLOG; CAUTIONARY NOTE TO LAY READERS." Thank you.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
2 comments:
Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Rudolph, the government alleged in a separate court filing, put $1.5 million into an account in his own name with UBS. But to conceal income he might earn on his investments made with the money, UBS helped Rudolph create a shell firm called Lucky Overseas Ventures. "
ReplyDeleteDoes that mean Rudolph did not use entity ? If not, then "how did he conceal income ? because he did not report on Schedule B ?
That could just be me -:)
The DOJ is baring is teeth to the Swiss power-brokers, with the one month incarceration. It is probably for being snubbed in the latest negotiations.
ReplyDeleteTo ij:
This guy has a lot of additional money, I suspect. $773,000 is nothing to him.
Regarding the corporate entity, who knows what they were planning. Neither UBS nor him seem to know what they were doing. All the money was already concealed by UBS (principal and interest), so there was no need for additional concealment. It sounds like a story they told the prosecutors, because it is what they wanted to hear.