Pages

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Major CA2 Decision on E&Y Tax Shelter Convictions (11/29/12)

The Second Circuit rendered its decision in the Coplan tax shelter appeal from criminal convictions.  United States v. Coplan, et al., 703 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 11/29/12). I offer four links to the case:  here is the copy from the Court site, here is a pdf that I have bookmarked (will have to download to see and follow the bookmarks), here is a link to a case service and here is a link to the GPO website.

Interestingly, oral argument was on November 14, 2011, so it took the panel to over a year to publish.

Given the scope of the opinion, I am going to address specific topics from the opinion in separate blog entries, beginning first with the Court's discussion of the Klein conspiracy as a prohibited common law crime, a deficiency that this panel of the the Court of Appeals could not remedy because the "common law" Klein conspiracy -- if indeed it as that -- had been approved and thus mandated for the panel by the Supreme Court and earlier Second Circuit precedent.  Other topics will following in separate blogs.

The subsequent blogs are:
  • Coplan #1 - Panel Questions Validity of Klein Conspiracy (12/1/12), here.
  • Coplan #2 - The Sufficiency Challenge for the Conspiracy Counts (12/2/12), here.
  • Coplan #3 - Venue for False Statements (18 USC 1001) (12/3/12), here.
  • Coplan #4 - Court Approves Defraud / Klein Instruction -- Making the IRS Job Harder May Be Enough (12/4/12), here.
  • Coplan #5 - Conscious Avoidance / Willful Blindness - Affirmed as to 1; Sidestepped as to 2 (12/4/12), here.
  • Coplan # 6 - Court Approves the Economic Substance Instruction (12/5/12), here.
  • Coplan #7 - Booker Variance Fixes a Glitch in the Guidelines (5/5/12), here,
  • Coplan #8 - Summary (12/5/12), here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.