Press releases are an important component of the Government's war on tax crime. The notion is that, for maximum general tax enforcement bang for the limited criminal enforcement buck, the public needs to hear that tax crimes are enforced and thereby encourage better tax behavior. Hence, publicity of criminal tax charges, convictions and sentences, by the IRS and by DOJ Tax is standard, almost daily, fare. For the IRS's publicity policy statement, see IRM 1.2.19.1.9 (Approved 05-23-1986), Policy Statement 1-183, here; for DOJ Tax's Policies, see AAG Memo of 9/8/2000, here; For DOJ Tax's 2012 press releases, see here. U.S. Attorneys also issue press releases in selective tax cases.
DOJ Tax recently issued a press release that has drawn controversy. The title of the press release is: Georgia Tax Cheats Indicted for Conspiring to Defraud the United States (5/23/12), here, The White Collar Crime Prof Blog questions the ethical propriety of the release. See DOJ Press Release Treads on Presumption of Innocence (White Collar Crime Prof Blog 5/24/12), here. Not only does the author of the blog call out DOJ Tax, but, via a comment to that blog (see the blog), so does Professor Monroe Freedman, a law professor and noted expert on ethics, see here. The point is that by calling them tax cheats DOJ has pronounced their guilt in a way that impairs the presumption of innocence. It would have been better to just say that the individuals were charged rather than calling the tax cheats or, alternatively, calling them alleged tax cheats. But alleged tax cheats may not have the same punch as just tax cheats.
I would appreciate comment from this community on the issues raised as to press releases.
I am aware of no response yet from DOJ Tax. I will post one if I hear of it.
Jack Townsend offers this blog on Federal Tax Crimes principally for tax professionals and tax students. It is not directed to lay readers -- such as persons who are potentially subject to U.S. civil and criminal tax or related consequences. LAY READERS SHOULD READ THE PAGE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN TITLE "INTENDED AUDIENCE FOR BLOG; CAUTIONARY NOTE TO LAY READERS." Thank you.
Pages
▼
Friday, May 25, 2012
5 comments:
Comments are moderated. Jack Townsend will review and approve comments only to make sure the comments are appropriate. Although comments can be made anonymously, please identify yourself (either by real name or pseudonymn) so that, over a few comments, readers will be able to better judge whether to read the comments and respond to the comments.
Refer the offender to the Ethics Committee. That's what I would do if I were the defendant's lawyer.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteU.S. taxpayers who make an honest mistake
on their taxes will never get to the level of the press announcement of an unsealed
indictment by the IRS or DOJ. That is reserved for tax cheats.
Is this not the real problem?
But, I know the word scholars in Arizona
are working on the term "Illegal immigrant" to be made a "Hate"
crime (not politically correct) you may want to ask them, they may have an idea
or two for the word tax cheat…..
I agree with the commentators on this posting. I would add that I would certainly encourage the defendant's attorney to make appropriate evidential use of the press release at trial or other proceedings.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately this is not new. I have seen press releases from regulatory agencies regarding cases with which I am very familiar.
ReplyDeleteI questioned the ethics of this when I worked for DOJ Tax and was told to shut up. On the civil side, often the complaints barely pass the Rule 11 test and are filed with little evidence, but the attorney is required to write a press release at the same time as he or she writes the complaint. It's unethical, in my opinion, to require attorneys in your section to go to the press in order to file a complaint.
ReplyDelete