Pages

Updates for Prior Blog Postings (8/6/24)

iN the past, I have often added information to a prior blog entry rather than creating a new blog.  Starting 8/6/24, when I add significant information to a prior blog entry, I will post here in reverse chronological order the revision so that readers can determine whether they might benefit from reviewing the information. Please note that each time I revise a page (such as this page) or a blog entry, I will update the date in parenthesis in the title of the page or blog entry.

Note: In the past, I had a similar posting on this page but through inattention dropped using it at the end of 2021. As of 8/6/24, I am starting using it again. I include the pre-2022 entries at the end of this page. 

Date

Blog Post

Update Infor

8/9/24

Sentencing Guidelines under the Loper Bright Non-Deference Regime (8/7/24; 8/9/24), here

Added discussion of United States v. Ponle, ___ F.4th ___ (7th Cir. 8/5/24) on the role of SubGuidelines commentary

8/6/24

Is It Too Much to Ask that the Defraud Conspiracy Crime Require Fraud? (8/3/24; 8/6/24), here

Added links to the petition for cert and Brief in Opp to the petition in United States v. Coplan, 703 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2012), cert. den. 134 S. Ct. 71 (2013).

 

 

 

PRE-2022 POSTINGS

 

Date

Blog Post

Update Info

12/30/21

Court Enters Stipulated Order to Prevent Alienation of Swiss Account Holdings (12/27/21; 12/30/21),here

Added Order in Schwarzbaum Granting Motion to Stay

12/21/21

Fifth Circuit Affirms Agency Best Interpretation of Statute, thus Not Applying Chevron (12/20/21; 12/21/21), here

Added JAT (i) Note ¶ 3 regarding potential issues with lenity ambiguity and Chevron ambiguity and (ii) Note ¶ 4 to discuss a related takings clause issue

8/3/21

Chevron and Interpreting Through Agency Adjudications (8/28/21; 9/3/21), here

Added discussion of sloppy thinking in Afanador v. Garland, ___ F.4th ___, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 25918 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)

8/21/21

The Impact of Chevron Deference is Exaggerated (8/19/21; 8/21/21), here

Added to the discussion an issue regarding equipoise and line-drawing.

8/20/21

The Impact of Chevron Deference is Exaggerated (8/19/21; 8/20/21), here

Added a discussion to indicate a possible, I think probable, reading of  Judge Lauber’s opinion as not deferring to the agency interpretation.

8/19/21

Tax Court Holds that Collected Proceeds for Whistleblower Awards under § 7623(b) Do Not Include Unrelated Collections (8/18/21; 8/19/21), here.

Added two comments (comments 4 & 5)

4/9/21

More Thoughts on APA and Legislative and Interpretive Regulations Inspired by Recent Cases (4/8/21; 4/9/21), here

Extended the discussion in the original posting.

3/19/21

Burden of Persuasion As to Proper Delegated Authority for Statutorily Required IRS Action (Here Notice of Deficiency) (3/17/21; 3/19/21), here

Added at bottom some musings on whether a presumption might apply to the § 6751(b) written supervisor approval issue

1/12/21

Deloitte and Tax Analysts Open Tax Analysts Library to Public Without Subscription (1/11/21; 1/12/21), here

Added some other free web research resources that I find helpful

12/10/20

Court Invalidates IRS Attempt by Rev Proc to Change Legislative Regulation (8/5/19; 12/10/20), here.

Added JAT Comment #5 to include the Bullock Court’s (Judge Morris) marvelous discussion of the distinction between legislative (which must be by notice and comment regulation) and interpretive rules (which may be by notice and comment regulation but generally are issued as subregulatory guidance.

11/25/20

Tax Court (Judge Lauber) Issues Significant Transfer Pricing Decision in Coca-Cola; Burden of Proof Issues (11/19/20; 11/21/20), here.

Added Comment 3 to add the need to constrict the range

11/21/20

Tax Court (Judge Lauber) Issues Significant Transfer Pricing Decision in Coca-Cola; Burden of Proof Issues (11/19/20; 11/21/20), here.

Added some nuance probably implicit in original blog post and provide some quotes from the opinion

11/6/20

FTPB 2020 Update 06 – Presumptions in Litigation (11/6/20), here.

Added Rule 301 as revised without change in material substance.

10/22/20

FTPB 2020 Update 05 - New IRM Summary of the § 6751 Written Supervisor Approval Requirement (10/22/20), here.

Provided new IRM provision

9/23/20

FTPB 2020 Update 04 - Correction on GATT Corporate Overpayment Interest (9/23/20), here

Corrected reference to GATT

9/2/20

FTPB 2020 Update 03 – Central IRS Web Site for BBA Centralized Partnership Audit Regime (9/2/20), here.

Link to Central web site

8/16/20

True or False: "Treasury and the IRS do not have a great history of complying with APA procedures" (8/5/20; 8/16/20), here.

In the original blog post I address two issues:  (i) Treasury/IRS history of complying with APA; and (ii) whether Chevron was always controversial.  I have amended the blog post to show that, while Chevron was controversial among some academics shortly after it was decided, it was not controversial on the Supreme Court until relatively recently (after 2010).

8/15/20

FTPB 2020 Update 02 - Revised Editions of Federal Tax Procedure Book for Technical Corrections (8/14/20; 8/15/20), here.

Advised that I posted to SSRN revised editions of the Federal Tax Procedure Book 2020 to make certain technical corrections.  The revised editions are available for download.

8/7/20

True or False: "Treasury and the IRS do not have a great history of complying with APA procedures" (8/5/20; 8/7/20), here.

Added some nuance on the trajectory of the controversy about Chevron deference.

8/2/20

The Unspotted Issue in an Audit; Ethics and Crimes (7/24/20; 8/2/28), here

Added a discussion (par. 7) discussion a practitioner’s comments.

7/29/20

The Unspotted Issue in an Audit; Ethics and Crimes (7/24/20; 7/29/28), here

Added 3 more comments (pars. 4-6) relating to the deficiency calculation for the Tax Court

7/28/20

The Unspotted Issue in an Audit; Ethics and Crimes (7/24/20; 7/24/28), here

Added 3 comments (pars. 1-2 relating to the claim for refund example and adding one related to analogous IRS conduct (par. 3)

7/24/20

Distinction Between APA Arbitrary and Capricious Review and Chevron Interpretive Reasonableness Review (6/19/20; 7/24/20), here

Added (at bottom) discussion or and quote from Grace v. Barr, ___ F.3d ___ (D.C. Cir. 7/17/20), here, that, despite some erroneous readings of a footnote in Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42, 52 n.7 (2011), the Chevron review and the 706/State Farm review are different analytical frameworks.

7/13/20

Baude NYT Opinion Piece on Originalism and My Questions (7/10/20), here

Added comment 2 directing readers to a particular Baude Volokh conspiracy blog offering, Reminder: The United States Code is not the law (The Volokh Conspiracy 5/15/17), here.

7/7/20

Highly Recommended Article on Chevron and History of Deference (7/1/20; 7/7/20), here

Added in par. 6 a discussion of judicial and agency interpretation as interpretive activity rather than legislative activity, citing Barr v. AAPC, __ U..S. ___, ___ S.Ct. ___ (2020), here.

7/6/20

Federal Circuit Holds that Refund Suit for Overpayment Interest is in the Federal Circuit.(7/4/20; 7/6/20), here

Add a link to Bob Probasco, The Tide Keeps Going Out, Carrying Overpayment Interest Suits Away from District Courts (Procedurally Taxing Blog 7/6/20),

7/3/20

Highly Recommended Article on Chevron and History of Deference (7/1/20; 7/7/20), here

Added a quote to my article regarding the parallel of judicial and agency interpretations.

6/23/20-6/26/20

UT Law Dean Farnsworth on English and Volokh Conspiracy Guest Blogs (6/22/20; 6/26/20)

Added updates on Dean Farnsworth series on his book on Classic English Style.

6/24/20

Distinction Between APA arbitrary and capricious review and Chevron Interpretive Reasonableness Review (6/19/20; 6/24/20), here

Added a discussion of two Tax Court Judge Kerrigan opinions conflating the distinction between arbitrary and capricious review and Chevron review.

6/24/20

Distinction Between APA arbitrary and capricious review and Chevron Interpretive Reasonableness Review (6/19/20; 6/24/20), here

Added a comment that I posted to Susan C. Morse and Stephen E. Shay (Guest Bloggers), In Altera Reply Brief, Taxpayer Doubles Down on Flawed Argument That the Government Changed Its Tune (Procedurally Taxing Blog 6/11/20), here

6/24/20

Supreme Court Case on Statutory Interpretation (6/16/20; 6/24/20), here

Added additional reading material, including Anita S. Krishnakumar, Three Lessons About Textualism from the Title VII Case, by Anita S. Krishnakumar (Notice & Comment 6/24/20)

6/16/20

Supreme Court Case on Statutory Interpretation (6/16/20; 6/24/20), here

Added a discussion of Judge Wood’s opinion in Illinois v. Wolf, ___ F.3d ___, ___ (7th Cir. 6/10/20), discussing dueling dictionaries

5/26/20

Tax Court Sustains Key Conservation Easement Regulation But Wobbles on Legislative/Interpretive Regulation Issue (5/14/20; 5/18/26), here

Changed the description of Correll case in paragraph beginning “Yet” as indicated in the redline.

5/18/20

Tax Court Sustains Key Conservation Easement Regulation But Wobbles on Legislative/Interpretive Regulation Issue (5/14/20; 5/18/26), here

Added Comment 4 on dicta.

5/17/20

Tax Court Sustains Key Conservation Easement Regulation But Wobbles on Legislative/Interpretive Regulation Issue (5/14/20; 5/18/26), here

Added discussion in Comment 3 on deference.

5/15/20

Tax Court Sustains Key Conservation Easement Regulation But Wobbles on Legislative/Interpretive Regulation Issue (5/14/20; 5/18/26), here

Added link in Comment 1 to Procedurally Taxing Blog post on case; added my comments on the TP Blog post in Comment 2

5/11/2020

Tax Court Conflates Standards for Testing Interpretive and Legislative Regulations (5/7/20; 5/11/20), here

Added a discussion of a recent Fifth Circuit decision with a similar conflation and a discussion of a similar case from the D.C. Cir.

5/11/20

Tax Court Conflates Standards for Testing Interpretive and Legislative Regulations (5/7/20; 5/11/20), here

Added a discussion of a recent Fifth Circuit decision with a similar conflation and a discussion of a similar case from the D.C. Cir.