tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post4014036773312618615..comments2023-10-24T08:00:53.865-05:00Comments on Federal Tax Crimes: Required Records Subpoenas Enforced (2/20/13)Jack Townsendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14469823736335455874noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post-83363280761593975562013-02-25T07:59:04.660-06:002013-02-25T07:59:04.660-06:00"I would have thought the contention was an o..."I would have thought the contention was an obvious proposition that would not have required authority.."<br /><br /> Apparently not. The Judge writes:<br /><br />"And they are precisely the types of records that a reasonable bank account holder would customarily keep. M.H., 648 F.3d at l076; see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena dated Feb. 2, 2013, --- F. Supp. 2d ----, 2012 WL 6106332, at *7."sdjknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post-29956637215924244622013-02-20T15:11:40.852-06:002013-02-20T15:11:40.852-06:00Just curious, assuming that appeals fail, do you t...Just curious, assuming that appeals fail, do you think this issue will ever wind its way up to the Supreme Court?Just_Me_Alsonoreply@blogger.com