tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post2879609996303916099..comments2023-10-24T08:00:53.865-05:00Comments on Federal Tax Crimes: Credit Suisse Update - The Aftermath for Credit Suisse #1 (5/21/14)Jack Townsendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14469823736335455874noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post-81683640929672704512014-05-27T14:44:26.621-05:002014-05-27T14:44:26.621-05:00Though CS didn't give client names apparently ...Though CS didn't give client names apparently they are giving statistical data about the accounts so that a group request can be crafted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1519969502186924526.post-78175495983511888572014-05-21T15:39:17.690-05:002014-05-21T15:39:17.690-05:00Actually, the CS [in]action by DoJ may be far wors...Actually, the CS [in]action by DoJ may be far worse than doing the usual nothing, as many media reports have noted: now that banks know the indictment is meaningless where's the deterrent?<br /> <br />And didn't Bradley Dougan perjure himself before the Senate when he swore the CS malfeasance was narrowly limited to a small renegade CS unit? Or is the Statement of Facts the lie here? <br /><br />Either Dougan and his fellow executives knew about what was going on and he should be removed (or course they did--otherwise they couldn't admit to the Statement of Facts). Or they didn't (suspending disbelief for a nano second), in which case they are incompetent and shouldn't be managing a major bank. Either case why did DoJ let them away with it. Malodorous! <br /><br />When are Holder and Keneally moving over to join Lanny Breuer at Covington & Burling?sissyfussynoreply@blogger.com